Long before memes, the picture postcard was how people mixed images with a quick message and passed it along. During the format’s heyday, roughly the two decades before World War I, it also became a vehicle for political persuasion, as scholar Kenneth Florey showsJ.

That boom overlapped with the peak of the suffrage campaigns in Britain and the United States. Of the many cards made on both sides of the question, a striking number feature cats, cast either as women’s companions or as stand-ins for women themselves.

Postcard: I Want My Vote!
I Want My Vote! Courtesy Votes and Petticoats: Postcards, The Sheridan Libraries, Johns Hopkins University.

The pairing of women and cats has a long and tangled history. In the Edwardian imagination, both belonged to the home: gentle, decorative, comforting. Yet animal lovers, unmarried women, and suffragists were also lumped together as suspect figures, admired and dismissed at once.

Many cards treat a woman asking for the ballot as no more serious than a kitten mewing, set against the colors of the militant Women’s Social and Political Union, a reading historian Krista Cowman offersJ.

Postcard: We Demand the Vote
We Demand the Vote: An Advocate for Women’s Rights. Courtesy Votes and Petticoats: Postcards, The Sheridan Libraries, Johns Hopkins University.

Other images are harder to pin down. A well-fed cat in WSPU colors and an extravagant hat may have been meant to mock suffragists as pamperedJ, but its steady gaze and raised paw carry a dignity that supporters could just as easily have claimed.

Editor’s note: The kittens in the voting-line photograph were live animals photographed by Harry Whittier Frees, not taxidermy. The text has been updated to reflect this.

Resources

JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers, and students. JSTOR Daily readers can access the original research behind our articles for free on JSTOR.

Postcards and the New York Suffrage Movement

By Kenneth Florey

New York History, Vol. 98, No. 3/4 (Summer/Fall 2017), pp. 441–464 · Cornell University Press

Go to JSTOR

“Doing Something Silly”: The Uses of Humour by the Women’s Social and Political Union, 1903–1914

By Krista Cowman

International Review of Social History, Vol. 52, Supplement 15 (2007), pp. 259–274 · Cambridge University Press

Go to JSTOR

From Pussy Panic to a Fascination with Felines

By Larissa Schulte Nordholt

Gender and Animals in History: Yearbook of Women’s History 42, pp. 188–206 · Amsterdam University Press

Go to JSTOR

Zoöphilpsychosis: Why Animals Are What’s Wrong with Sentimentality

By Tobias Menely

symplokē, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2007), pp. 244–267 · University of Nebraska Press

Go to JSTOR